Behaviorism - A Methodological Proposal of Explaining the Behavior Essa

Behaviorism must be seen as a methodological proposal of explaining the behavior of organisms from the lowest to the highest. Explaining humankind and nonhuman behavior by reference to scientific laws and the theories expressed of corporeal states, events, and entities. Because modern psychology emerged roughly in the mid-19th century, information of behaviorism was self-collected in its early stages by introspection (looking at your own cozy states of being your own desires, feelings, and intentions) wherefore linking them to the distant manifest state.Introspection is a notoriously unreliable method for gathering information for scientific theories. at that place atomic number 18 2 problems1) The introspection data is private. It is impossible for some nonpargonil from the outside to know the inner states of someone else.Science demands publicly observable events for a community of scientists to confirm or reject empirical possible action by designing and testing experime nts in an open arena for all new(prenominal) scientists to observe.2) There is very little access to ones fall mental being (consciousness) since so much of it has been repressed into the unconscious.1913 - J.D. Watson proposed the only appropriate object of study in psychology is behavior.Behavior is publicly observable .A team of scientists prat observe the same phenomenon under investigation. They can then formulate a hypothesis to account for those behaviors. They can then form experiments so they can confirm or reject those hypothesis designed to explain the behavior of organisms.the father of behaviorismExclusive assist given to publicly observable behavior.There will be no discussions on dreams, hopes, desires, feelings, or internal events.They must be avoided since they dont offer explanatory value.Skinner deserves most of the credit.Behavior is the product of ge gainic endowment (5%) and environment (95%).Marx is an economical predestinarian, Freud is the mental determ inist, Skinner/Watson are environmental determinist - all events that occur in nature including those that we single out that are important (human actions) are themselves the inevitable common product or burden of prior anteceded forces over which the individual has very little control over (determinism).We know man as an autonomous being (one whose choices are the answer of decisions made, on our part, freely). The person is then responsibl... ...culture when he himself is conditioned by one? D. Logical fallacies Reductionism. Whatever the theory doesnt account for does not exist. Whatever my net cant catch aint fish. Since Skinner cannot catch freedom or dignity, mind, morals, reasoned thought, or God, he insists that none of these things exist. E. There is no place for a climb in Skinners ideal society. But rebels are what bring roughly the intellectual and moral growth of a society. F. Ideas from modern physics and parapsychology appear to stand in opposition to Skinners theories. IV. SUMMARY The teachings of behavioral technology are a useful educational tool but must not become a tool of manipulation. We find fault with Skinners starting point, i.e., his assumptions about God, man and his environment. Skinner is a good technician, but a unretentive philosopher. Skinner asks us to replace the novel of freedom and dignity for the myth of scientism (naturalism). V. CONCLUSION Getting back to freedom and dignity involves acceptance of an unnumerable reference point. DarwinAll organisms produce more offspring than that can by chance surviveAll organisms vary within a speciesSome of this divergence is inherited