Supreme Court Holdings Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Supreme Court Holdings - Essay Example unify States, 365 U.S. 505, 509 -512 (1961).2This however, which held that, when the Government does engage in physical intrusion of a constitutionally protected battlefield in order to obtain information, that intrusion may constitute a violation of the Fourth Amendment rase if the same information could have been obtained by other means.3The search and seizure in U.S. v. Karo was highly unusual. However, it was held that the evidence seized in the house in question, however, should not have been suppressed with respect to any of the respondents.4The information that the ether was in the house, verified by use of the beeper without a warrant, would be inadmissibleinvalidating the search warrant5 So, even though the search warrant was eventually inadmissible, there was full evidence that was pertinent to the case which was not tainted which allowed for the defendant to finally be prosecuted.This premise wont be violated,no warrants shall issu e, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the view to be searched, and the person or things to be seized.7To this writer, what is particularly disturbing is that the Fourth Amendment does not guarantee entirely against unreasonable searches and seizures, as the plaintiff in Knotts and the defendant in Karo were both subject to actions basically without warrants. Further, what is more than cogent is that one needs to impress upon those in power that the authorities must obtain a search warrant from a magistrate by showing the need for it, and to conduct themselves according to law. This is an important guarantee of the right of privacy.8To the naked eye it seems that Constitutional rights were violated. In both cases, sufficient evidence was purportedly later found to corroborate with not having invaded personal privacyand if personal privacy was invaded, Constitutional