Top Mama's Case Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

coronate Mamas Case - Essay ExampleUpon leaving the studio, she was arrested and charged with indecent exposure. Top Mama was found inculpative and sentenced to jail term of 30 days. Her conviction in the lower courts was upheld. Reaching this Supreme Court, we should clearly reason the initiatory and Fourteenth Amendments invoked in this case. According to Mark Stevens (2003), all together, there are six (6) rights guaranteed by the freshman Amendment -- religion, barbarism, press, assembly, association, and ask --Congress shall stupefy no impartiality respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free process thereof or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.Collectively, they protect what is known as the freedom of expression(Stevens, 2003). Mark Stevens (2003) give tongue to that association is a derivative right from speech, assembly, an d petition. The right to free speech is more commonly referred to asfreedom of speech.Justice Hugo Black (1937-1971) was the last to believe the absolutist interpretation of the First Amendment which states that Congress shall make no law means that Congress shall make no law. Such an absolutist interpretation of the First Amendment leaves no restrictions on obscenity, libel, or slander (Stevens, 2003). More predominant interpretations look at speech as distinct fromspeech plus doings, or theeffects of speech. Congress has every right in the being to control these things (Stevens, 2003). Its also possible to draw upon the mixer contract theories of the founding fathers to understand that the First Amendment was intend to serve several important social functions. These functions include educational function, safety valve function, truth-seeking function, and lastly, the social obligation function. These social functions indicates that the First Amendment is about protecting the pub lic good rather than individual freedom and that freedom of speech in America has never been absolute (Stevens, 2003). In the case at bar, Top Mama was invoking the First Amendment on freedom of speech, or in her case, the symbolic speech. Symbolic speech is the nonverbal communication same to speech or conduct that may receive protection under the 1st Amendment. During 1960s and 1970s, the principal(prenominal) issue was symbolic speech which Antiwar protesters were not so much saying things as doing things, like desirous flag, draft cards, holding sit-ins, love-ins and the like (Stevens, 2003). According to Stevens (2003), one of the first cases which considered whether symbolic speech such as this deserved constitutional protection was the 1968 case of U.S. v. OBrien. In theOBrien Test, organisations must have a substantial government interest that is not related to suppressing the message before contemplating action restricting expressive conduct or symbolic speech such as i t is unconstitutional to have a flag desecration law if the only reason for having it is that people should respect the flag (Stevens, 2003). This is the most widely-used test. The Court was providing absolute protection to the message, exactly not the conduct (Stevens, 2003).OBrieninvolves some deep psychological issues as thecritical test for separating message from conduct (Stevens, 2003).Thought and belief are not subject to government control, but speech is often the link amid thought and action (Stevens, 2003). The current situation is that symbolic speech, likeflag-burning, is constitutionally protected. In a finalise 5-4 majority withTexas v. Johnson (1989), the Court upheld the right to burn the flag, regardless of its symbolism, as long as a gap of the peace does not occur (Stevens, 2003).