'Political Islam Essay\r'

'The constant bereavement of westerly secular ideologies to founder a try for the problems facing humanity has given nascency to the political side of Islam. Since its inception in to the initiation, western principles remove done nought and abuse and brutalize Muslim doctrines, traditions, values, and culture. To add more insult to injury, western ideologies hand over implanted a control sound of progress to Islam in its nonstarter to uplift the economic conditions of Moslem societies and nations. disposed(p) the extra-religious motivations, political Islam or more ide everyy known as Islamic fundamentalism is provide by a multitude of concerns that choke off Islam in numerous shipway possible.\r\nIn order to expound the symptoms that lead to the foundations of Islamic political thought, caper Esposito lists down and discusses varying frameworks for such phenomenon. He first explains the mischance brought about by the secular philosophies justifies Islamâ⠂¬â„¢s legitimacy as an alternative prepare of ideology in governments and societies. Esposito simply suggests that the Muslims cannot be blamed if ever they result to allegedly unorthodox ways to subsidize be capture the nevertheless choice left for them is to look for separate non- dirty option to uplift their worsening economic, cultural, and virtuous breakdown (Eposito, 2000).\r\nEsposito also contends that the use of gird forces such as the Taliban in Afghanistan have made a vital mortala in setting the course for Islamic fundamentalism’s resurgence (Eposito, 2000). The resurfacing of Islam in a more extreme manner has its subside cause in other angles asunder from the contributions of various militia forces. Primarily, the rise and mastery of Judeo-Christian traditions in various sects well-nigh the world is a credible angle, this is because Judaism and Christianity have particular doctrines which are at odds with Islam. Though they do not antiaircraf t places of worship, Muslims still violate Christian and Jewish laws through their radical behavior.\r\nJohn Esposito (2000) implies that Islam or Islamic Fundamentalism for that matter is a graphic symbol of civilization collision between ii different civilizations. He furthers that the rising ferment of religion in international mortalal matters contributes to the troths of civilizations. In this particular argument, Esposito attempts to generalize the role of religion in other endeavors, but religion has its own interests to pursue. In Islam’s case, how can its adherents postulate a world order if the doctrines that highly influence their ways of life are incoherent?\r\nThe meeting of civilizations theory is just as the homogeneous as clash of interests. If a person does not concur with the conception of a particular ideology; it is his or her license to disagree and not adapt to it. Esposito’s framework in this sense is as simple as the coupled Sta tes refusal to encompass the concept of communism and the Soviet cause during the 1950s. Osama bin Laden for instance, expresses a keen deal of impertinence over the United States and its ideologies, that’s how he justifies his acts of terrorism in various cities and countries, but if he wants to guide Islam as the world order, he is then(prenominal) misguided by his alleged advocacies that would keep open the world.\r\nDemocracy’s main concept is freedom; republic refuses to be fettered by laws that hinder progress. Religion in the meantime has its own foundations based on what is chastely right and morally wrong. It is quite sizable how Esposito gives a non-biased discussion of whether there is conflict of interest between Islam and democracy. He concludes that governing is more influential here and not religion, and that failure to support civil monastic order as well as failure to participate in political personal business strengthens religious and secular authoritarianism (Esposito 2000).\r\nIt is plausible to think that there can be a mediating factor between Islam and democracy; this is due to the fact that both ideologies have a homogeneous cause, which is to pursue the scoop interests of the people. It is quite true that Islam and its conformists are on the receiving end of western immoralities; however, it is a person’s own will whether to conform to what certain aspects of western ideologies imply. Furthermore, although Islam and democracy whitethorn have some overlapping and unconnected principles, a certain application of uncouth respect is possible to satisfy all angles in conflict.\r\nIn Light of John Esposito’s article regarding the resurrection of the Islamic resentment over western secular ideologies, a number of questions are raised to manoeuver the matter:\r\n• How is terrorism justified as a counter-measure against the perceived immoral and corruptive nature of western thought?\r\nâ €¢ In what context and up to what extent does â€Å" hatred” apply in western ideologies?\r\n• If Mohammed were live today, would he be having a similar response to the nature of western views as modern political Islam conformists do?\r\n• Do the Political Islamists simply advocate for the upholding of Islam’s tenets or do they also lust for global power in other aspects such political and economic?\r\n• If Islam in itself postulates a diversity of beliefs, how can Islamic fundamentalists constitute their very core ideas in to the world?\r\n'